I guess the developers of Mozilla have never used the "download" manager themselves! Now its very simple, I download something for viewing, but once I've viewed it, I might want to permanently store it. So I go to the Download Manager which is clearly saving the file in a temp area. There is NO WAY for me to store something that I've downloaded already, and is already stored in a temp place.
Is it too much to ask -- and why must I ask? for something so obvious? -- that the file be "saveable" from the so-called download manager?
I think the problem lies in the "disconnect" that exists between opensource developers and the actual users of a product. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, albiet in politer terms: The opensource developers need to get out of their shell and look at things from a user's perspective. We realize you're doing everyone a great favor by creating a product that is "free". But at the same time, you need to behave exactly as a for-profit corporation would act to respond to their customers. As a matter of fact, that's where the distinction lies between for-profit and "free" software. The capacity of the developers to bridge the gap b/w the development effort and the end-users. This is no doubt a sacrifice on their part, but, personally, what is the point of a sacrifice if you don't do it properly?
If you write off your users as "lazy" who could just as easily go to the temp directory and manually copy the file, then you're as guilty as the "Mega Corp" who thinks they know what's best for the users. The difference might be that users are shielded from the condescending attitudes of the Mega-Corp-Developers, while they bear the full brunt of the Open Source developer!
Just my 2cents worth!
7:46:34 PM
|