|
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
|
|
|
Peter Orszag is a national treasure.
I'm watching the Finance Committee hearing on Social Security. Peter Orszag of Brookings and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities just had a wonderful metaphor to respond to the idea that private accounts are a "sweetener" or "dessert" to...
[The Decembrist]
8:39:33 PM
|
|
Notes from the Front: Louisville. I
just finished a live interview with FOX, up against Rev. Albert Mohler
from the "Justice Sunday" event. Of course, FOX had him live on camera
while I was on via telephone (hiding from the wind noise in my rent
car) with my picture on screen. DriveDemocracy was described by FOX as "protestors."
Mohler was a late switch. I was supposed to be on with Tony Perkins
of the Family Research Council. So I wasn't quick enough to remind
viewers that Mohler is the fellow who said "I believe that the Roman
Catholic Church is a false Church."
But I did say that my great grandfather from a few (10) generations
back was the last man hanged during the Salem trials (his name was
Samuel Wardwell), that I knew religious persecution when I saw it, and
that I thought he should retract the organization's statement that
Democrats were using the filibuster against people of faith. [BOPnews]
5:04:02 PM
|
|
Thanks to Senator Reid. Senate
Minority Leader Harry Reid is paying attention to the blogosphere. We
get daily memos from his office, and this morning had the honor of
engaging him directly in conversation on a conference call. There will,
I hope, be more of this — it's extremely useful to have an opportunity
to clarify with him points of his agenda, and to hear from his own lips
such quotable tidbits as
"I do not have a single Senator who is a non-believer."
The core of the conversation was the nuclear option and what measures Reid and the Democratic caucus have planned to meet it. [BOPnews]
5:01:06 PM
|
|
Paging Howard Beal.
This post is not going to tell you anything you don't already know.
That said, it probably says a few things about what we see and how we
are trained to look. The radical Christian Conservative
"anti-filibuster" telecast, "Justice...
[BAGnewsNotes]
4:44:07 PM
|
|
Bruce Bartlett Is Also Worrying About "Hard Landings".
He writes: Bruce Bartlett: Steering clear of a recession: The place
where the greatest danger lies is with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac...
even the tiniest mistake by them could roil markets... the impending
retirement of Alan Greenspan as chairman of the Fed.... Lastly...
[h]uge budget and current account deficits mean that vast amounts of
capital flows are necessary to keep them funded. So far, this has gone
well... the Chinese have been so accommodating about financing the....
But now the U.S. is strongly pressuring China to stop doing this in
order to allow its currency to rise against the dollar. It is hoped
that this will reduce China’s production advantage in dollar terms and
bring down the bilateral trade deficit. However, the cost to the U.S.
economy if this happens could be greater than the potential gain. At
least in the short run, any scale-back in China’s buying of Treasury
securities might cause interest rates to spike very quickly. This could
prick the housing bubble and bring down home prices, eroding personal
wealth and putting a squeeze on those with floating rate mortgages.
Hopefully, this can all be managed smoothly and without either a
recession or a market break....
[Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal]
4:42:08 PM
|
|
A brief break from our regularly scheduled programming to alert our
readers that James Wolcott's send up of the blog-spy-cocktail party
circuit is quite a hoot....
[War and Piece]
4:38:35 PM
|
|
Mainstream Press Blows Condi’s Coverup (war on terrorism)
That our new Sec. of State
tried to bury the estimate that major world terrorist attacks tripled
in 2004 is not news to the blog world. But now MSNBC is running
the story via Reuters. Hopefully, a real debate on how best to fight
the war on terror will finally begin. Whether this debate gets this
White House to take action remains to be seen.
- PGL [Angry Bear]
4:37:03 PM
|
|
Social Security: Time For An Exit Strategy.
From the rally at the Capitol to the results of a new national poll,
all signs are pointing to what a Weekly Standard columnist wrote
recently: The president and his Republican colleagues need a Social
Security exit strategy.
[TomPaine.com]
4:35:01 PM
|
|
Social Security Cooties.
Here's the latest on Social Security:On the eve of the first congressional hearing on the restructuring of Social Security, Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee signaled that they will not insist that personal accounts be part of the...
[Political Animal]
1:48:34 PM
|
|
Rolling Stone reports on what it calls 'Bush's Most Radical Plan Yet,' a three-sentence proposal tucked away in the federal budget that "would enable the Bush administration to achieve what Ronald Reagan only dreamed of: the end of government regulation as we know it."
[Cursor.org]
1:44:45 PM
|
|
Bolton Watch.
"Bolton Waits" (The Telegraph) Bolton Watch
Team Agonist | San Antonio |
Ongoing Stygius - The Times on Bolton's British Problem In the wake of the Newsweek report on Bolton's ejection from the Libya WMD negotiations in 2003, The Times of London has some more details on Foreign Secretary Jack Straw's fury at John Bolton's 2004 attempt to sabotage Europe's negotiations with Iran: As a series of new allegations against Mr Bolton put his chances of confirmation further into doubt, details emerged of how a furious Mr Straw told Colin Powell, the former US Secretary of State, that Mr Bolton was trying to destroy a European initiative on Iran’s nuclear programme. Mr Straw made the complaint after he became convinced that Mr Bolton was the source of an article on the front page of The Times last July quoting an unnamed senior US official who dismissed the initiative as “spring training” and advocated “regime change” in Tehran. The Times has never revealed its source. More after the jump and more at the link.
Laura Rozen has more on the UK-Bolton flap.
[The Agonist]
10:42:13 AM
|
|
Scare Tactics.
To make its case for Social Security reform, the Bush administration resorts to highly irregular accounting practices.
[TomPaine.com]
10:39:37 AM
|
|
Working for it .
Two-thirds of Americans support Democrats blocking extremist judges, and most also oppose the nuclear option. So, in the face of such public support, what are the Democrats doing? According to the LAT, they plan to take the Broder Option of caving in if the Republicans promise to be nice for the rest of the year. Ahem.
Faithful Progressive asks, "So Who Got The Better of it on Sunday?" There's bad news and good news.
John Aravosis has an even more sickening update to the MS story: Microsoft paying Religious Right leader Ralph Reed $20,000 a month retainer. "Let's hire Ralph Reed to tell us how to get rid of all that cumbersome good will we've built up over the years!"
"It's not about the money!" says Joe Vecchio, but it sure would be a good idea if progressives could get together and support each other instead going off into their own corners to fight their specific causes. The Republicans got that message a long time ago, and have managed to keep each other afloat even though, unlike us, their goals are really in conflict with each other's. The right-wingers actually find ways to pay the people who work for them. The Democratic leadership just asks our folks for more money. Hey, the least you can do is Support Your Local Blogger.
Brian Sedgemore, long-time Labour MP, has defected to the LibDems, urging voters to give Tony Blair a "bloody nose" at the polls. He accused the prime minister of telling "stomach-turning lies" over Iraq and using the "politics of fear to drive through parliament a deeply authoritarian set of law and order measures". Charles Kennedy says this undercuts the only real argument Tony Blair has been able to offer for a Labour vote - the risk of letting the Tories in. Kennedy says it's not a credible threat and that the center and left should feel confident of safely voting for the Liberal Democrats.
See the finalists for MoveOn's Bush in 30 Years contest. [The Sideshow]
7:22:26 AM
|
|
Birds of a feather.
After fully investigating ourselves, we have come to the conclusion
that we are innocent. And infallible. Under the circumstances, Human
Rights Watch is urging the United States to name a special prosecutor
to investigate the culpability of high-level officials, including...
[Body and Soul]
6:20:02 AM
|
|
Japan's Deflation...
...seems to never end. The
Japanese economy slowed last year (again), and the BoJ's hoped-for
return of moderate inflation remains an elusive goal
:
Drop in consumer prices pressures Bank of Japan
Consumer prices fell for a seventh straight year in the 12 months to
end-March 2005, confirming that the economy remains stuck in deflation
in spite of three years of stop-start growth.
...The Bank of Japan is on Thursday widely expected to
put back its prediction of a return to inflation from this year to next
when it publishes a six-monthly report on future trends in prices and
economic activity. Last October, the BoJ forecast a return to mild
inflation, of 0.1 per cent, in the year to end-March 2006.
Sadakazu Tanigaki, finance minister, said: “The causes
of deflation are hard to specify, given prices of some products started
rising and corporate profits remain firm. But the fact remains that we
are in deflation and we must continue efforts to beat it.”
Other data released on Tuesday contributed to what
economists say is a fuzzy picture of an economy struggling to ease out
of last year’s mild recession. Workers’ household spending was up 1.7
per cent in March against the previous year, while seasonally adjusted
unemployment fell 0.2 percentage points to 4.5 per cent.
Atsushi Nakajima, chief economist at Mizuho, said: “The
current situation is far from clear, but I am fairly confident about
the economy in the near future.” Mr Nakajima cited continued strong
growth in China, Japan’s biggest trading partner, and near-record
corporate profits as reasons to be hopeful. Risks came from continued
high oil and raw materials prices, as well as what he said were
less-than-bright prospects for the US economy. Japan has certainly provided macroeconomists with an
excellent demonstration of just how difficult it is to get out of a
deflationary cycle once you're in one.
This also reminds those of us who worry about the
sustainability of BWII just how different the situations of Japan and
China are. Unlike China, Japan is unambiguously in the position where
the inflationary effects of propping up the dollar are not just
tolerable, but to be positively welcomed. But at the same time, it is
China that has been forced to continue buying dollar reserves, while
the yen's peg against the dollar has been sustained with relatively
little intervention from the Japanese authorities in recent months.
This type of data makes one think that they'd almost welcome the chance
to start intervening again...
Kash
[Angry Bear]
6:18:25 AM
|
|
When Troubled Topper$ Topple.
George W. Bu$h is in deep trouble - and he knows it. Bush to Tell
Saudis Oil Prices Will Damage Markets President Bush on Monday said he
would tell Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah that high oil prices will damage
markets...
[The Left Coaster]
5:45:20 AM
|
|
Showdown In The Caspian: Part I
A few days ago, during Condoleeza Rice's visit to Moscow, the news reports
all gave the impression that the relationship between the U.S. and
Russia was more or less sound, except for a few relatively minor
concerns (securing loose nuclear material, Putin's creeping
authoritarianism). In other words, here are two natural allies with a
few, shall we say, differences of opinion.
Fair enough, though
not much attention seems to be paid to the thumb wrestling going on
over oil and natural gas down in the Caucasus areas. Could this region
turn into the source of greater disputes between Russia and the United
States, especially as oil continues to grow scarcer and the great
powers are forced to jockey for waning resources? Maybe. I don't know.
But it sure seems like an important region to understand, so
after a bit of googling and reading up, I'm going to try to put
together a little primer on the Great Game being played out in the
Caucasus region between our two favorite Cold War adversaries. Feel free to point out any mistakes, and I'll patch it up.
First, a map will come in handy here:
Yeah,
that's the ticket. Now as we would expect, Russia under Vladimir Putin
is surely trying to ascend to great power status once again. And the
road back involves oil. Lots of it. Oil and gas account for about two-thirds of Russia's export revenue and a quarter of its GDP. And most importantly, Russia's trying to dominate the oil-transport
game, fighting to make sure that any oil or gas that comes out of the
resource-rich Caspian area goes through Russia first. And when I say
"resource-rich", I mean resource-fucking-rich: the Soviet republics surrounding the Caspian are all told sitting on up to 200 billion barrels of oil—nearly as much as Saudi Arabia's 250 billion. So the Russian pipelines will do two things in the coming years: a) provide Moscow with a nice chunk of revenue, and b) maintain Russia's influence over the oil producing republics down south.
Naturally,
the U.S. feels a bit uneasy about Russia having a monopoly on oil
transport—ideally we'd like to construct pipelines that go from the
Caucus oil and gas producers directly to the Black Sea and Turkey. As
you can see in the map above, that means going through Azerbaijan and
Georgia. Hence, the multi-million dollar BTC pipeline, which runs from
Baku, Azerbaijan, to Tblisi, Georgia, to Ceyhan, Turkey, as follows:
Not surprisingly, the U.S. has lavished aid on Georgia for the past ten years—about $800 million—and
has been involved in training the Georgian military forces. Russia,
meanwhile, has tried to maintain its influence over the region by
keeping its forces in the northern autonomous regions of Georgia,
including Adzharia, and has shelled out a good deal of aid to two of
Georgia's more rebellious provinces, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. (When
Georgia tried to invade Abkhazia in 1993, for instance, Russia helped
repulse the Georgian force.) The U.S., understandably, is worried that
the rebel provinces will stage attacks on the BTC pipeline, or sabotage
it, and has prepared the Georgian army for this possibility.
I
haven't said anything about the much-lauded "rose revolution" that
toppled Eduard Shevardnadze in December of 2003. It's no secret that
the rise of Mikhail Saakashvili was perfect for the United States—here
was a leader who would keep Georgia stable, oppose Russian influence in
the region, and call for Russia to withdraw its troops from Abkhazia. A
leader who would keep the BTC pipeline safe. Of course the U.S. backed
him; they'd be stupid not to. But in the grand scheme of things, I
don't think Saakashvili will change the larger dynamic much.
Then there's Azerbaijan.
If you don't want to pipe Caspian oil and gas through Russia or Iran,
it has to flow through Azerbaijan. The BTC pipeline starts in Baku. So
the U.S. doesn't try to rock the boat here; the ruling Aliyev dynasty
is brutal, having stolen election after election, including most
recently the younger Aliyev's sham ascendancy to power in 2003, where
security forces beat protestors, and over 300 were ruined. But that
doesn't matter: what truly matters is that the elder Aliyev signed a
$7.4 billion contract with 10 oil companies back in 1994, including BP,
Unocal, and Pennzoil. Needless to say, after the 2003 travesty, Richard
Armitage in the State Department quickly made the call to congratulate
Aliyev. Warmly. Okay, map-time again!
Again,
Russia is none too pleased with U.S. influence in Azerbaijan, and has
sought to aid and arm the country's longstanding neighbor and enemy,
Armenia, as well as the disputed province of Nagorno-Karabakh (that
little inset region), which was the source of a five-year war between
the two countries. (The U.S., for its part, has been warming towards
Armenia in recent years, offering greater economic and military aid.)
Is it possible that Russia is hoping to stir up trouble in the region,
of the sort that will make the BTC pipeline too unstable to use,
forcing the oil to flow back through Russia? Maybe. Maybe not.
Recently,
it seems that Russia has resigned itself to the BTC pipeline's
existence, and may even start investing in it. (More of a concern to
oil investors is Iran, which could very well use its terrorist network
to sabotage the pipeline. Who knows? Rumors
spread like avian flu. Certainly Russia and Iran wouldn't shed too many
tears if the BTC were sabotaged and an alternative pipeline, going
through Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and then down through Iran to the
Persian Gulf became the main outlet for Caspian oil and gas.) But it's
awfully remarkable how one need only follow the pipelines to figure out
how and why the great powers are acting in the way they are.
Anyway,
this is only a rough overview of what's going on east of the Caspian.
There's also a whole horde of interesting stuff about pipelines west
of the Caspian, involving Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Iran, Afghanistan,
Russia, the U.S., and—dum, dum—China. But I'll save all that for
another post.
- Brad
[Bradford Plumer]
5:35:06 AM
|
|
The Salt Pit.
I missed this story when it came out a few days ago, but it's important
enough to back to, however late. I've written before about Khaled
El-Masri, the German citizen whom the CIA kidnapped and flew to a
prison in...
[Body and Soul]
5:32:52 AM
|
|
Prey together, stay together.
I know some people like to pretend that Libya trembled under the
weight of Bush's all-powerful manhood, saw the light, and was
transformed, but I didn't know our relationship was this cozy: A
British resident has claimed he was tortured...
[Body and Soul]
5:31:21 AM
|
|
Democratic Senate Strategy.
Monday I joined Senator Harry Reid's blogger conference call to hear
about how the Democrats plan to resist the Republican abuse of power as
Majority Leader Frist leads the Senate off the nuclear option cliff.
Senator Reid started the call...
[The Left Coaster]
5:29:30 AM
|
|
No Child Saved From Gangs .
I guess Laura Bush is now a George Bush stand-in. The USA Today story is called Budget shifts funds for gang prevention and the first graf has the usual "Bush doing something good" sound, but of course it's the reverse, as usual:Ten-year-old
Alex Baeza, a fifth-grader at Reynolds Elementary School in Tucson,
took a few tentative steps toward gang membership but ultimately walked
away. His counselors credit federally funded counseling in how to set
and achieve goals.The $34.7 million Elementary and Secondary
School Counseling program is slated for elimination in President Bush's
2006 budget plan. Blackamericaweb has a different slant on this item: Bush Cutting Anti-Gang Programs While Touting New Initiative:Black
congressional Democrats say President George W. Bush has seriously
undermined his national anti-gang initiative by eliminating nearly $1
billion in social programs designed to offer young adults -- and black
boys in particular -- an alternative to hanging out in the streets.Members
of the Congressional Black Caucus maintain that Bush, in his 2006
budget, cut a number of successful after-school programs and grants
that were preventing young adults from joining gangs and participating
in self-destructive behavior. Where is the money
going, then? Into PR, apparently. The chair of the Congressional Black
Caucus, Mel Watt (D-NC), says: ""We all know what the problem is; we
don't need to study it to death. All they want to do is talk. Bush
needs to fund the programs that already exist."Looks like another
program to funnel money to people who don't actually know anything but
need monetary rewards for being part of the right-wing movement to
destroy America.
[The Sideshow]
5:25:18 AM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2005
Michael Mussington.
Last update:
5/1/2005; 4:29:11 AM.
|
|
|